UPDATE 2019-11-27: The feeds and speeds have been tweaked based on further experimentation.

To date I’ve managed to not do any threading on the parts I’ve made on my Pocket NC v2-50.  However, I’m about to do a number that require both M3 and M2.5 threads, so I figured it was time to figure out how to do it.

Online tutorials are kinda all over the place in both how you handle things in the model, and how you program the CAM.  Some assume you model threads as a hole of the major diameter, some as a hole of the minor diameter, although none that I could find used the new Fusion 360 “threaded” hole type, which is what I wanted to use.  That said, using the “threaded” hole type appears to be treated basically as a minor diameter hole with a minor caveat.  You would expect that since Fusion knows the minor and major diameter, the “pitch diameter offset” would be relative to a zero tolerance thread, but in fact it appears to be relative to the minor diameter as if you had modeled a minor diameter hole.  Oh well, I just experimented with increasing pitch diameters until I had threads that fit relatively tight for the two that I cared about, which fortunately can be both made using identical tools, although the M2.5 hole is only on the edge.

Some time ago I put in orders for all the long lead time items on a second version of the moteus servo.  This is primarily aimed at improving the manufacturability and reliability, along with some minor performance improvements.  I’ve now got at least samples of all the long lead time parts in house!

While not perfect, now that I have flux braking in place, I have now succesfully pronked around for a while without faulting!  There are a number of outstanding problems that still need to be addressed:

• Sometimes the landing phase is erroneously cut short
• There is occasionally a grinding like noise that sounds like some controller is unstable
• I think the lateral movement is not working correctly
• The gait needs to be smarter about moving the legs past the center point when in mid-flight, and changing the gait period to achieve different speeds
• And probably a bunch of other problems I haven’t even identified yet

That said, it is still fun to watch it romp around!

In the last post in this series, I conducted a fit test on the new chassis.  After my ignominious belly-flop, I now had a more urgent need to complete the switch.

The chassis cracked in the corner, completely separating.  Doing anything more with this chassis was likely to result in many more things breaking very quickly.

Build process

So, here are the photos as I put everything together.

Now that I can do controlled jumps, and have a UI which allows me to use the joystick, I finally started actually working towards pronking gaits.  Too bad for you, this post doesn’t have any details, merely a video snapshot of my learning and debugging process…

Now that I had a controlled jump with the quad A0, I wanted to chain those jumps together into a pronking gait.  The first part of that was creating a mechanism by which I could actually command varying motion commands.  For the previous full rate experiments, all I had built was a CLI that allowed you to type commands.  That sufficed for initiating a single jump, but not really for moving around in space with a dynamic gait.  Something with a joystick would be necessary.

After CADing up the second revision of the chassis, I set to work with the 3d printer and printed up all the pieces.

There were a few minor post-modifications I had to make, which were all much faster than printing the pieces again.  All the holes for M3 bolts were slightly undersized, so I drilled them out.  The battery holder had a channel to let the power wires out, which inexplicably terminated before reaching the edge of the holder.  I also had to install all the heat set inserts.

As described in my roadmap, the chassis for the quad A0 was on the verge of failing, or causing the shoulder motors themselves to fail, after only a few hours of walking around.  Also, it was nigh impossible to assemble, disassemble, or change anything about it.  Thus, the chassis v2!

More than one piece

The old chassis was a single monolithic print that took about 35 hours of print time.  Because of its monolithic nature, there were lots of interference problems during assembly.  For instance, the shoulder motors could only have 4 of the 6 possible bolts installed, and 2 more of the bolts extended beyond the chassis entirely.  I decided to break it up into multiple pieces, which uses a lot more inserts and bolts, but should allow for a feasible order of assembly and manageable repair.

Now that I have a full rate inverse kinematics and dynamics solution, I can begin to do more interesting things.  A while ago I did the first jump on the quad A0 – in that video I used a limited technique just to verify that the platform was indeed capable of jumping.  The joints were commanded in an open loop fashion, and really only at the transition points of the jump sequence, relying on the control loops in the servo to actually achieve each stage of the jump cycle.  That resulted in the jump only being minimally controlled… tracking errors would result in the robot taking off from a not-level position and the timing was not super reliable to boot.

Last time I updated my inverse kinematics solution to also include dynamics, velocities and forces.  Now I’m in the process of integrating this onto the robot.

The old SMMB / HerkuleX control software commanded the servo positions in an open loop, which did not take into account the actual position of the joints in any way.  What I’ve done now is implemented a control flow where at each cycle the state of all 12 servos is sampled, then the control laws are applied based on that state, then the resulting commands are sent out.