mjbots.com now stocks PWM controlled cooling fans with RPM sense and mounting brackets that are compatible with the moteus-r4, moteus-n1, and moteus-x1. Check them out here:

Read on to see how much these can improve the performance of your system and what configuration options are available.

Well, that didn’t take long! Only a short time ago I announced the first release of the moteus performance analysis tool. In that short time frame, I basically did a complete rewrite (more on that later on), that added a bunch of new capabilities. You can now create nearly any table comparison you can imagine, enter custom motor configurations and even produce 2D graphical plots showing supply power, temperature, or efficiency versus speed and torque. Check out the tool live here, and read on to learn more.

Recently I showed I was able to use the new dynamometer fixture I built to capture detailed thermal modeling parameters for motor controllers and motors. In this post, I’ll describe how I turned that into the initial version of a tool that lets you compare the performance of different moteus controllers (and some others), along with different motors, to help design an overall motion system.

TLDR: Try it out: Moteus Performance Analysis Tool

In the last post, I gave an overview of what thermal metrics are relevant to motor drive applications and how they drive the important performance metrics of controllers and motors. In this post, I’m going to look at how to measure those thermal parameters empirically in at least a crude way, but with enough accuracy to be useful for practical design applications.

What do we want to measure?

There are a set of parameters that we would like to be able to measure that have some overlap between the controller and motor case. For both, we want to be able to measure:

One of the things I’ve been wanting to understand better for quite a long time is the thermal performance of moteus and motors when used in realistic applications. In many, if not most systems, thermal limits of one or another determine the eventual sizing of controllers and motors and are one of the most important performance factors. I’ve covered this before to a superficial degree in a previous post (customizable pwm rate) but it was far from a general solution. The newly provisioned dynamometer fixture, with its ability to accurately measure input current and power, provided a great opportunity for finally tackling this. This post will describe a bit of the motivation for the work and why you should care.

When I first posted the qdd100 beta on mjbots.com, I performed a simple “continuous torque” test where I measured the torque that could be applied indefinitely without thermal limiting in a lab environment. It has come to my attention that other servos rate their “continuous torque” for a much lower value of “continuous”, sometimes only 30s. To make the situation clearer, I measured the time to thermal limiting at a range of torques and updated the product page.