Exciting news! All the existing moteus controllers in the world now have an upgraded default maximum power and upgraded rated maximum power as of release 2025-03-27! Depending upon the input voltage and PWM rate, sometimes nearly twice the amount. First, check out the comparison table, then the rationale:

	Old default max / rated	New default & rated
moteus-r4	340W / 450W	900W <= 30V, 400W >= 38V
moteus-c1	75W / 100W	250W <= 28V, 150W >= 41V
moteus-n1	340W / 1200W	2kW <= 36V, 1kW >= 44V

Background, why a power limit?

moteus brushless motor controllers drive 3 phase PMSM motors, accepting a DC input voltage, and outputting current to each of the 3 phases of the motor. It does so using MOSFET based switching, which alternately connects each phase to either ground, or the DC positive input. As that switching progresses, charge is either drawn, or replenished into, the onboard bulk capacitors.

It’s time to announce support for yet another encoder type in moteus, this time the MA600 precision tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) sensor. Compared to hall effect magnet angular sensors the MA600 has lower noise and less non-linearity. It has a SPI interface and operates from 3.3V. When used with moteus, it can be connected to AUX2 on moteus-c1 and moteus-n1, and to AUX1/ENC on moteus-c1, moteus-n1, and moteus-r4. Support is available in firmware version 2024-10-29 and newer.

On axis performance

To show what it is capable of, I mounted a small breakout board above an on-axis magnet attached to a mj5208.

A permanent magnet motor controller like moteus has to, at the end of the day, apply voltages to the phase wires of a motor in order to induce currents. Those currents generate magnetic fields that push against permanent magnets in the rotor to make the motor move. I’ve looked at parts of this process before, see “Compensating for FET turn-on time”, but in this post we’ll look at an additional technique that can extend the effective modulation depth, thus increasing the maximum speed that a motor can be driven.

Here’s a bit more in-depth discussion of a yet another new feature from moteus firmware release 2024-10-29: pulse width modulated output on auxiliary ports.

A pulse width modulated signal is a logic level signal of a fixed frequency, where the duty cycle, or width of the pulse, is changed or modulated to communicate a scalar value. Obligatory Wikipedia diagram below:

The new feature does what it claims to do, in that a subset of auxiliary pins can now be configured to output a PWM signal. If so configured, the duty cycle can be controlled using either the diagnostic or register protocol.

When operating a moteus controller with a brushless motor there are two main things that can get hot: the FETs (field effect transistors) on moteus and the motor itself. By default, moteus has built in thermal throttling and fault detection if the FET temperature exceeds rated limits. In many configurations, the motor can be thermally connected to the moteus controller, so that the same FET temperature sensing can be used to prevent damage to the motor, but that isn’t always the case.

TLDR: As of firmware release 2024-05-20 moteus can now report a pretty good estimate of the electrical (and thus mechanical) output power going to the motor. You can get that through all the language binding options or in tview!

Background

Brushless motor controllers like moteus act like step down DC/DC converters. Their input is a higher voltage and low current, while the output to the motor is low voltage and higher current. If working properly, the output current is driven so as to produce torque at the output shaft.

As of pypi 0.3.68, tview has gained the ability to delay execution of a compound command until the currently executing trajectory is complete. This can be useful for developing more complex motions that consist of multiple steps.

To use it, just issue a '?[optional_id]' in your command sequence. For instance, to move to position 1 and come to a stop, then move to position 0 when that has completed, you could do:

The moteus line of brushless motor controllers currently require a CAN-FD host to send commands in order to actually execute a motion profile. moteus has long provided a python library that can be used on desktop operating systems to send commands and parse responses, and recently added a C++ one as well. Next up, and described in this post, is a library for Arduino which provides the ability to command and monitor brushless motors using moteus motor controllers.

Recently I covered a new feature for the moteus brushless controller that improved robustness for velocity control when external torques exceed the maximum allowable control torque. In this post, I’ll cover a feature that can be used for a similar situation in position control, “recapturing position and velocity”.

In some applications, while in position mode, it can make sense to limit the maximum torque during specific periods so that external torques are able to overpower the controller. The most obvious case would be if the maximum torque is set to 0, or the kp and kd scale are set to 0 temporarily. A problem then arises when resuming control, as the “control position” will be wherever it last was, despite the fact that the actual motor have have been dragged by the external torque some distance away. When the torque limit is released, a large transient can develop as the controller tries to instantaneously get back to the old control position.

The moteus brushless motor controller supports several concepts of operation from within its primary “position” mode, including a velocity mode. As documented in the reference, you can run in that scenario using commands equivalent to the diagnostic mode command:

d pos nan V nan

Where V is the desired velocity. However, as with most control operations, there are a number of edge cases that can be useful to handle. When operating purely in velocity mode, the normal PID constants can be interpreted slightly differently: